5 Factors That Will Help Identify the Best Leak Tester for You


Best, is at best, a subjective term. What’s best for one person or one application may be different to that which is best for another. However, there are ways to help arrive at a logical and informed choice that will result in identifying the best leak tester for you. Let’s take a look at 5 factors that will help identify the best leak tester for you.

5 Factors that will help identify the best leak tester for you


Factor # 1. Be Prepared

Be prepared to discuss the application with a leak testing specialist in detail. Figure 1 shows how different classes of leak testers match up to these requirements. Following are the factors and questions that need to be addressed prior to speaking with a leak test technology specialist:

Figure 1: Possible leak test solutions are unlimited; this chart shows a few of the choices or test specifications that help leak testing specialists zero in on the best match. USON leak testing specialists will help companies find the best leak tester for their application at no charge.
  • Physical parameters—What is the internal volume of the part to be tested? At which test pressure(s)? At what leak or flow rate specifications? What is the part made of? How much give or flexibility is in the product material?
  • Details of how the part or assembly functions—In what type of environment will the part or device be used? Will it be operated in a controlled environment, pressurized room, or operated by someone at home or other uncontrolled situation?
Above – USON’s video consultations facilitate precise recommendations for seals or other fixturing in automated machinery that matches the geometry, flexibility, and other physical characteristics that bear on testing efficiencies.

Leak test environment—Cleanliness does impact the way in which a leak tester enclosure needs to be chosen. Will testing be done in a cleanroom environment or an industrial one where NEMA enclosures are required?

  • Stage of manufacturing—At what point in the assembly process will the test take place? Is it directly after a glue weld or molding process such that temperature compensation will need to be figured in for the part to be tested?
  • Production targets—What is the expected throughput of the manufacturing operation? In turn, this will help determine the optimal test cycle targets per component at the desired production rate, as well as the number of testing stations, test channels, and/or Range of NDT (non-destructive testing) tests required—Many medical devices need a combination of related NDT tests (e.g., flow, leak, burst, occlusion, crack pressures, sealed component tests and more). Similarly, many devices have numerous subassemblies that need to be tested.

Factor #2. Visual Inspection

Always give priority to consulting with the leak test specialist in a manner that enables detailed visual inspection and, in some cases, dissection of the assembly In many cases, for example, the patent-pending medical device for which a test system is being created cannot leave a manufacturer’s facility. Videoconferencing makes that obstacle moot. Face-to-face discussions (even via video conference) are always a better option than simply trying to explain something over the phone. What these video consultations enable are precise recommendations for seals or other fixturing in automated machinery that matches the geometry, flex, and other physical characteristics that bear on testing efficiencies.

Uson SprintmD is a powerful, multi-function, tester


Factor #3. Testing Sequence

Make sure that the discussions include detailed analyses of whether parts of components can be leak tested simultaneously or whether the sequence of tests required makes asynchronous multi-channel leak testing a better match. This is not simply a matter of looking at lower costs, though that is one inevitable byproduct when getting into this level of detail. It is also a matter of test accuracies afforded by sensors that are tuned to different pressures as well as the cycle time for tests with particular sensors. Multi-channel and multi-sensor leak testers are the types where the most recent innovations have occurred.

For example, consider today’s standard blood oxygenator. In these types of devices, the circulating blood, oxygen, and warm saline chambers operate at different pressures. If using a leak tester with three sensors scaled to operate at maximum efficiency at these three distinct pressures, a more efficient system is created. Note that the upfront cost of any leak tester is not the same as the real testing costs. Cycle times factor in and, in turn, relates back to the sensitivity and pressures to which the sensors being used are tuned. Testing costs per channel and testing costs per sensor are factors that create significant forks in the purchasing decision trees.

Factor #4. Features and Options

There is a wide variety of options among leak testers, such as those relating to I/O sophistication and the number of test steps that can be programmed. If flexibility is important, there are leak testers that have been designed with that requirement as core. Similarly, some leak testing equipment has numerous data communication options. These types of factors are always important with any system, but they are critical to blueprint in detail when enlisting a leak tester manufacturer to provide a total turnkey leak test solution.

OptimavT is a versatile, feature-packed, tester for the toughest testing challenges.

Factor #5. Configurability

sprint-4chThe necessary configurability of the leak tester needs to be identified. Today’s technology improvements allow engineers to pick leak testers with totally customizable pneumatics, test methods, data communications, and storage. For example, with a system capable of performing more than a dozen types of NDT tests in any order, the number of permutations reaches into the millions; it is easy to see how flexibility needs to be a focal point. Additionally, configurability enables the engineer to not only have the best leak test technology for the application at hand, but also for the next device that is only on the drawing board.

Perhaps the biggest mistake manufacturers make is when an antiquated leak tester that was built with one pressure and sensor range in mind for an earlier generation device is used for a new application. While it will work in some fashion, it is certainly not optimal. Typically, the regulators and flow sensor ranges are off and the tester “limps” to the finish line during every test cycle. Often, it will only take 48 hours to get a no-cost detailed application analysis to determine if a leak tester is suitable for a specific task.

Similar posts